I also believe that it's a fake story, just like

送交者: 何人可于 2007-01-05, 19:13:08:

回答: 轰炸大和岛由 HunHunSheng 于 2007-01-05, 16:31:30:

many others. It's unlikely that the "dogfight" could happen between 第二次世界大战时的活塞式螺旋桨飞机 and 最新式的F－86喷气式战斗机, and the former beat up the latter. If so, we might see a Pekingese beating up a Rottweiler in a real dogfight :-(. Is it possible? Think for yourself.

所有跟贴:

你没看见志愿军方面损失是美军的两倍？ - 揍汉奸 (42 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:17:40 (118832)
- My common sense tells me that - 何人可 (113 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:27:23 (118837)
  - 您以为你是谁？ - 揍汉奸 (224 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:33:08 (118840)
    - I meant 轰炸机不可能打下歼击机. Also, as you said, - 何人可 (600 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:51:38 (118848)
      - “轰炸机不可能打下歼击机”？？二战里这样的战例多了去了。 - 揍汉奸 (124 bytes) 2007-01-05, 20:13:57 (118858)
        
        propeller against propeller is more feasible, propeller against jet, - PhonyDoctorPhD (57 bytes) 2007-01-05, 21:27:16 (118878)
        
        luck就luck罗 - 揍汉奸 (41 bytes) 2007-01-05, 21:40:04 (118884)
        
        nope, propeller vs propeller, bomber at least can aim :D (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 22:55:39 (118896)

加跟贴