送交者: xinku 于 2006-2-20, 20:46:53:

回答: that sounded more realistics. This is basically an IBM batch 由 steven 于 2006-2-20, 20:42:22:

because there are multi processes running in memory. Some of them are outputing, which means they are not occupying CPU, some of them are calculating, which means they have to occupying CPU, and the others are waiting for the CPU. You have to deal with muliti process scheduling in this environment.

• Just because there are many processes in the memory doesn't - steven (242 bytes) 2006-2-20, 21:04:31
  • 他们对这种Time-sharing有自己的术语：抢占式 - xinku (236 bytes) 2006-2-20, 21:12:16
    • of course that is a lot harder, it involved to save all the registers - steven (287 bytes) 2006-2-20, 22:47:41
      • Donot understand at all... - xinku (180 bytes) 2006-2-20, 23:01:38
        • refuse to learn? Well, I don't have to teach you anyway. - steven (0 bytes) 2006-2-20, 23:09:34
          • If you are willing to teach, we can continue - xinku (97 bytes) 2006-2-20, 23:15:44

加跟贴