He was trivializing the argument.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: LB 于 2012-03-27, 15:09:23:

回答: 你没明白他问的是什么 由 eddie 于 2012-03-27, 13:16:14:

You cannot use trivial things like 'burial insurance' to argue against 30 million people without health insurance while they are still living! In the same way one can argue about smoking tax or even sneezing tax! A supreme court judge got to be smarter than that.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明