So, no international law is violated

送交者: qm 于 2015-05-21, 15:14:33:

回答: Under international law, the construction of artificial islands confers no right 由 JZ 于 2015-05-21, 13:19:19:

As I knew, there is no international law that prohibits construction of artificial island.

China can build the island but does not automatically has the sovereignty.

In reality, international law on disputed area has always been status quo. Whoever occupies a disputed area has the de facto sovereignty. As a result, if China builds it, she owns it.

I am no fan of Chinese CCP government. But there it violated no international law by building island.

所有跟贴:

only the coastal state has the right to construct artificial island in its EEZ - JZ (420 bytes) 2015-05-21, 15:56:28 (779667)
- UNCLOS agreements - JZ (175 bytes) 2015-05-21, 16:03:19 (779670)
  - you need to either take some serious course in law, or in English, or in logic (无内容) - pgss (0 bytes) 2015-05-22, 00:35:08 (779725)
  - You don't understand what is "exclusive right", do you? (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2015-05-21, 23:16:01 (779705)
    - That "exclusive right" is nonsense - qm (245 bytes) 2015-05-21, 23:54:24 (779715)
    - You have a serious problem - qm (249 bytes) 2015-05-21, 23:46:34 (779712)
  - Again, no violation - qm (212 bytes) 2015-05-21, 22:43:51 (779700)
- And nobody recognizes China's 9-dash line claim - JZ (23 bytes) 2015-05-21, 15:58:28 (779668)
  - R you really sure about your claim like this? Don't just copy US's news. - bsys (225 bytes) 2015-05-21, 16:35:50 (779673)

加跟贴