有人认为这个结果与其说和干细胞有关倒不如说和癌细胞有关,你怎么看?


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Amsel 于 2014-01-31, 22:16:31:

回答: 应该是满世界,不是满坛子。大家都等着后续结果呢 由 whatistruth 于 2014-01-31, 20:17:23:

那个读者调查后面
http://polldaddy.com/poll/7760216/?view=results

引用:
1 COMMENT

Naushad Moti     - 13 hours ago
After going through this paper, the more I read reviews from experts in the field, the more I am inclined towards the non-existence or I would rather say, potential effects of STAP stem cells on Homo sapiens. First, the paper (and review by Dr Knoepfler) suggests that stress do create a microenvironment for the cells of dedifferentiate and mimic somewhere between PSCs and ESCs. I would agree with Dr Knoepfler, that now a range of paper would get published suggesting other stress-related stem cell production. I feel, this might be a useful area of research in cancer biology as previously, it has been identified that stress (for e.g., hypoxia) do have a role to play in the production of Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) in many human cancers. The cells, under stress, do produce acid and therefore, this study further enlighten the fact that the production of acid by certain cells render them to dedifferentiate and work as CSCs. This could also be a valuable study to prove the controversial existence of CSCs and might be a very good avenue to artificially make them and study their biology. Summarising, i think it could be a valuable asset in CSC biology rather than normal stem cell biology.Thank you




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明