送交者: Rodger 于 2005-5-29, 21:49:31:
张亚平的Nature,Science的文章他确实是合作者，“一查吓一跳”引用的那个五四青年奖章的新闻报道里也是说“他和合作者”。
PNAS上查到作者里有张亚平的文章有4篇：
Wendy E. Grus, Peng Shi, Ya-ping Zhang, and Jianzhi Zhang
Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals
PNAS 2005 102: 5767-5772;
Yuan-Chun Ding, Han-Chang Chi, Deborah L. Grady, Atsuyuki Morishima, Judith R. Kidd, Kenneth K. Kidd, Pamela Flodman, M. Anne Spence, Sabrina Schuck, James M. Swanson, Ya-Ping Zhang, and Robert K. Moyzis
From the Cover: Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus
PNAS 2002 99: 309-314
Yuan-Chun Ding, Stephen Wooding, Henry C. Harpending, Han-Chang Chi, Hai-Peng Li, Yun-Xin Fu, Jun-Feng Pang, Yong-Gang Yao, Jing-Gong Xiang Yu, Robert Moyzis, and Ya-ping Zhang
Population structure and history in East Asia
PNAS 2000 97: 14003-14006
James Swanson, Jaap Oosterlaan, Michael Murias, Sabrina Schuck, Pamela Flodman, M. Anne Spence, Michael Wasdell, Yuanchun Ding, Han-Chang Chi, Moyra Smith, Miranda Mann, Caryn Carlson, James L. Kennedy, Joseph A. Sergeant, Patrick Leung, Ya-Ping Zhang, Avi Sadeh, Chuansheng Chen, Carol K. Whalen, Kimberley A. Babb, Robert Moyzis, and Michael I. Posner
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children with a 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 gene have extreme behavior but normal performance on critical neuropsychological tests of attention
PNAS 2000 97: 4754-4759
其中第三篇张是通讯作者。“一查吓一跳”为何只列出其中一篇张作为合作者的文章，令人费解。
另外张在American Journal of Human Genetics上有三篇通讯作者一篇合作者的文章。这杂志算不算“顶级”，各人有不同的标准，可是不知什么原因“一查吓一跳”偏偏又把这杂志漏过去了。
张亚平是不是有资格当院士“一查吓一跳”当然可以提出他的见解，不过在指责别人的时候，是不是自己也可以更客观一点呢？