Your knowledge about AI may warrant an upgrade :)



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: 自如 于 2005-6-16, 13:10:00:

回答: 大胖星: I found “How the Mind Works” is not a very good book 由 AI 于 2005-6-16, 10:27:22:

Ten years ago, the AI community already published a collection of papers seeking combination of SAI and NN. The consensus is that the intelligence mechanism is way too complicated and there require many levels of representation/modeling. Those who conclude SAI is dead based on the resurgence of NN in the 80's have not seen the whole picture.

In the context of Machine Learning, NN is but one kind of hypothesis spaces. All the enthusiasm is largely based on the rediscovery of BP algorithm that breaks the previous pessimism culminated by Minsky's Perceptron. Yet it is far from the omnipotent method for AI, nor is its popularity due to resemblance to real neurons.

The brain is by far the most complex system known in the universe. Human intelligence is the result of billions of years' evolution. Even great figures sometimes underestimate the challenge. For example, Brooks@MIT who proposes situated AI vows that reflex agents like circuits are enough to model intelligence. It may be true for a frog, but very unlikely for a Homo sapience equipped with self consciousness and by far the highest level of intelligence known.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl