送交者: apate 于 2005-1-17, 15:42:11:

回答: I was not talking about man vs. man 由 Enlighten 于 2005-1-17, 15:39:07:

how can you talk about *man* while yourself being just *a* man (or a woman)? thinking you can speak for all men and women and boys and girls is that of either Kant or an old emperor with new clothes.

• The topic derives from the discussion about - Enlighten (151 bytes) 2005-1-17, 15:52:04
  • there you go again - apate (568 bytes) 2005-1-17, 15:56:22
    • You are confused - Enlighten (952 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:12:25
      • don't want to waste my time here, but mark this: - apate (946 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:43:34
        • You are still confused - Enlighten (336 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:58:06
          • well... - apate (2795 bytes) 2005-1-17, 18:27:36
      • so. what's your vocabulary, without using - apate (292 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:29:17
        • It's a scientific matter, so use the language of science - Enlighten (154 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:41:15
          • ok - apate (860 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:53:21
          • "any" should be "all" - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-1-17, 16:42:30
    • correction - apate (135 bytes) 2005-1-17, 15:58:11

加跟贴