Interesting. So the Supreme court can still overturn this precedent


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: ASH 于 2022-07-12, 10:55:51:

回答: 一个被遗忘的案例:1882年排华法案之后,最高法院“钦定”的美国公民也要被逮捕驱逐 由 newcomer36 于 2022-07-12, 02:40:09:

With a 6:3 conservative majority, they can easily do so. It is a matter of how to interpret the 14th amendment.

引用:
The Texas Republican Party 2022 platform approved June 16 calls for a constitutional amendment to “support a change to the 14th Amendment to eliminate ‘birth tourism’ or anchor babies by granting citizenship only to those with at least one biological parent who is a US citizen.”

引用:
Wong also returned to San Francisco from a nine-month trip to China in August 1895, again leaving his family behind. Although he had been allowed to return to the United States twice previously, this time he was detained by U.S. immigration agents looking for a court test of whether the 14th Amendment granted birthright citizenship.

The case made its way to the Supreme Court, which ruled 6-2 in March 1898 that Wong and other children born to immigrant parents in the United States were citizens. It is one of the most impactful Supreme Court opinions in history.





所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明