I can not derive it to you on the spot.



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-9-12, 16:10:21:

回答: 这句话不懂: got a less valuable object (yet, bidding is still optimal for him) 由 peanut 于 2005-9-12, 15:40:12:

Roughly remembering that the person with highest information bid like in the private valution case, with the surplus in the case, but actually he is getting value in the case that the true value which is based on his and others information is less than his own private information (otherwise he won;t win). Hence winning is a curse.

"yet, bidding is still optimal for him"--we derive it by using what if he bid espilon less than his private information, but forget the details.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl