送交者: Enlighten 于 2005-9-27, 11:49:45:

回答: 给一次性筷子算笔经济账：用一次性筷子不浪费 (ZT) 由 Latino2 于 2005-9-27, 11:15:14:

“王处长也有笔林业经济账，目前原木的售出均价是200元/立方米至300元/立方米，
现在用做筷子就可增值两三百元，比其他用途的经济效益好。”

“原木”显然不仅包括小树也包括大树，而且主要是指大树。这说明不仅用小树做
筷子赚钱，用大树做筷子也赚钱。

经济规律决定：
1。小树用不完的地方，筷子是用小树做的。
2。小树用完的地方，大树肯定也被拿去做筷子了。

• Yes. Sustainable is the key. But I'm afraid they don't care - Enlighten (31 bytes) 2005-9-27, 11:58:09
  • This probably requires some law and regulation. But we all know - Enlighten (338 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:03:46
  • They are as smart as we are. That's why people plant poplar and pine trees - Latino2 (27 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:02:56
    • But if using the existing big trees is also profitable, they will cut it too. - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:06:10
      • The old trees will be cut and the new ones will be planted. - Latino2 (49 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:08:52
        • 我认为衡量筷子工厂对环境影响的最终的标准应该是： - Enlighten (182 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:26:23
          • Partially agree. Economic and environment impact needs to be assesed - Latino2 (277 bytes) 2005-9-27, 12:41:37
• 大树做筷子也不错, as long as the supply can be sustainable. - Latino2 (42 bytes) 2005-9-27, 11:55:19

加跟贴