That's ironic. (paper and comments included)



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: xj 于 2005-10-14, 12:32:04:

回答: 关于GM,又在Science上吵起来了 由 bingo 于 2005-10-14, 12:01:06:

The first comment shows the science although the commentators are kind of in disagreement with Chinese authors. The pointed out that pest level should be taken into account, and the overuse of pesticides can be reduced without harming the rice yield. I also think an experiment comparing GM rice with normal rice/low pesticide is worthwhile.

The greenpeace group is totally bullshitting. They cited rumors to accuse the paper.

I think the major concern in that paper is that it is a survey from all sorts of experiments. Thus it used regression adjustment to control important confounding factors.

I am not sure why they didn't do a meta-analysis on better designed experiments.

Do we have a large scale GM experiment in China? If not, that would be a big shame.

paper:
http://www.xlogit.com/test/688.pdf

comments:
http://www.xlogit.com/test/231b.pdf




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl