送交者: skipper3 于 2005-10-20, 17:32:37:
make it clear, in one sentence, what you are arguing about.
Based on my loose observation, your argument is surrounding whether KMT or BaLu or American N-bomb or Soviet Re Army contributed the most to the defeat of Jappan in WW2.
Before you start, you need to define what "defeat" in this context is. Surrendor is a symbol representing a defeat but not the whole truth of defeat. Loss of troops has very little relevance to defeat. Now I can think of this definition should fit well for "defeat": "Failure of achieving predetermined strategic goal (of the war Jappan started)".
Now identify what is Jappan's strategic goal. You need to do wome homework reviewing some historical document to find that out.
After all these are done, you can start debate:
Among KMT, BaLu, American, Soviet, what have each party done and how much have they done to make Jappan fail to achieve it's strategic goal?