Wood, 那些研究里的遗传率不是狭义的Mandelian遗传率
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: Enlighten 于 2007-05-03, 11:59:59:
I've said it VERY VERY clearly:
(我这里说的遗传率是指Hammond研究里用统计算出的那种遗传率。)
所有跟贴:
What so ever ... sounds a bit strange anyway (无内容)
-
Wood
(0 bytes)
2007-05-04, 05:06:28
(138886)
为什么很多学生物的思维都不清楚? (无内容)
-
Enlighten
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:11:57
(138826)
为什么很多不学生物的人在生物问题上都自我感觉这么良好呢?
-
方舟子
(14 bytes)
2007-05-03, 23:55:07
(138882)
避免打击面太广特此声明:生物的糊涂虫多但不排除有明白的:) (无内容)
-
Enlighten
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:56:52
(138839)
那个糊涂虫付新员也是学生物的 (无内容)
-
Enlighten
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:53:49
(138838)
还是斑竹明智--在生物还没有把脑子全部毁坏时就出来了:) (无内容)
-
Enlighten
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:47:38
(138835)
再给学生物的普及一下孪生实验的limitations
-
Enlighten
(344 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:21:44
(138829)
how do you know the difference is not a result of that in genes? (无内容)
-
eng
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:44:29
(138833)
I don't know. But the burden of proof lies with the researcher
-
Enlighten
(73 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:49:57
(138837)
this is not a matter of "burden of prooof"
-
eng
(351 bytes)
2007-05-03, 16:44:23
(138858)
Hunhun, the non-biologist, said it well
-
Enlighten
(111 bytes)
2007-05-03, 12:28:21
(138831)
Banzhu said that we should not trust Hunhun. (无内容)
-
Latino2
(0 bytes)
2007-05-03, 14:40:49
(138847)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)