送交者: tupper 于 2007-05-31, 16:20:23:
回答: 出了汉芯这种事,国家更应该加大对芯片业的投入 由 阳明 于 2007-05-31, 13:40:58:
好的设计,好的产品和用别人的架构,工具没有必然什么联系吧.看看这个AMCC刚公布的Titan dual-core processor (8,000 Dhrystone Mips@2GHz, 2.5 watts per core). 架构PowerPC是IBM/Moto的, Fast14 technology是Intrinsity的, 工艺是TSMC的90-nm, 设计工具没说,估计也不全是自己的.
http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=NDAGGDLZHNIIGQSNDLPCKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=199601034
不一定非要重走长征路,重上井岗山,或者太阳红,向党忠什么的吧?
Intel在中国建芯片厂应该是省了不少的钱的. Otellini这么说的:
Otellini had some other messages, too. For the U.S.: get more competitive or else. It costs Intel $1 billion more to build a factory in the U.S., he said, naturally encouraging the chip giant to scour the globe for options. Of it's last three advanced factories, two have in the U.S., and one in Israel. "The fourth one is (in China) today. So we are taking a fairly global view on these investments, and weighing the all core expertise we have at existing sites against the cost savings and incentives that governments can give us," he said.
http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=LIDKGJHPZEEBKQSNDLPCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=198500601