送交者: steven 于 2005-11-01, 14:18:45:

回答: 他唯一用到的地方是在介绍法律的TITLE的时候： 由 右派网 于 2005-11-01, 14:10:08:

Don't bullshit either. Of couse NOC is not "protected by USC 421" The CIA does not acknowldge NOC, and subsequently, NOCs will not be protected by dipomatic means. However, the identiies of NOCs are classified. Therefore, leaking classified information to the public VIOLATES THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES.

• your point was already covered/refuted in my article - 右派网 (598 bytes) 2005-11-01, 14:26:07
  • that is totally bullshit. Classified information is a LEGAL terms - steven (1051 bytes) 2005-11-01, 14:43:32
    • Fitz said my point - 右派网 (1611 bytes) 2005-11-01, 14:56:28
      • Those somebodies were not under investigation. That - steven (3163 bytes) 2005-11-01, 15:31:10
        • also, you now agreed the media lied 3000+ times, Hmm?? - 右派网 (930 bytes) 2005-11-01, 15:37:43
          • I said she was NOC, don't you read? - steven (130 bytes) 2005-11-01, 15:51:10
            • I read you said NOC and the media said "Covert Agent". - 右派网 (138 bytes) 2005-11-01, 15:59:36
            • covert agent in the definition US code 50,426: - steven (1286 bytes) 2005-11-01, 15:58:08
              • However your liberal mindset prevented you to think - 右派网 (660 bytes) 2005-11-01, 16:03:26

加跟贴