Well, you oversimplified 理科 and attacked 理科人士 unfairly



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: Enlighten 于 2005-1-30, 20:27:43:

回答: don't jump the gun. 由 skipper3 于 2005-1-30, 20:07:08:

I just want to show you science is not as narrowly defined as you thought. And 理科人士 don't always take an hour to make a decision when it starts to rain very hard.

Your criterion for a good decision vs. bad decision is oversimplified too. Due to the uncertainty of future events, even a good decision might be "unlucky" sometimes and bad decision might be "lucky". So the outcome is not the only criterion.

Below is how you started:
"Oversimplification, exactly, A typical problem for 理科人士。"
"This is 文科。Scientific reasoning does not apply well becasue there is
not enough information to allow a flawless logical thinking."



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl