送交者: xj 于 2005-12-27, 20:23:33:
回答: How about this, 由 html 于 2005-12-27, 20:15:57:
Sir,
As a royal reader of the New York Times since I came to the US in 1990, I often cite the Times as the standard of good journalism when I criticize bad journalism of Chinese media. However, I was disappointed to see such a biased and inaccurate report published by the Times (Rule by Law: Seeking a Public Voice on China's 'Angry River', by Jim Yardley, December 26, 2005). Much of its inaccuracy and misleading information had been corrected when I replied to Mr. Yardley questions by email in December 7, 2005 (see the enclosure). Unfortunately, he simply ignored my opinions. Writing as if none of the opponents of the so-called "environmentalists" answered his interview requests, and accepting rumors and lies spread by the "environmentalists" as facts, Mr. Yardley reported only one side of the story told by the "environmentalists".