送交者: CP 于 2005-2-05, 18:25:06:
回答: 就王成朴博士的遭遇再说两句 由 上海工人 于 2005-2-04, 20:57:39:
多谢大家的支持。
我最近又有了其它有意思的结果，将会在合适的时候与大家分享。发表的梦不做了，
所以我要把对我文章的审批登出来驳一驳。带着伯克利狼的建议，我又将对我文章
的审批好好读了一遍，摘下这一段论述，看看以这样的审批标准，我的文章能不能
被发表：
"The paper has little novelty.
I must recommend that this manuscript does not have enough novel work in
it to merit publication.
This work is built upon the Active Pages work and as such uses many of the
applications from that project. One missing reference which is very relevant
to the theoretical bent of this work is..."
其实我写专利，也是为了求得一种发表的方式，并没用发财的梦。