送交者: JJZ 于 2008-04-25, 08:07:12:

• btw, just to make it clear so that you don't misunderstand the joke, - steven (291 bytes) 2008-04-25, 12:29:58 (221339)
  • NP, I posted this just try to say "the author had no idea what they meant" - JJZ (51 bytes) 2008-04-25, 12:44:40 (221348)
• I don't. I haven't paid much attention to Chinese or Russian fighter aircrafts. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 11:38:25 (221329)
• 歼8II 于1989 年运付美国改进, 军事专家看看8: - JJZ (1223 bytes) 2008-04-25, 08:26:39 (221251)
  • I don't know the much about this subject. However F-16 - steven (79 bytes) 2008-04-25, 12:57:00 (221354)
  • 扯淡！事实是美方因为6/4而开始厌恶中方，随即中断计划，而且扣住飞机不还 - xinku (20 bytes) 2008-04-25, 08:50:26 (221261)
    • Agree, 因为6/4合作取消. 但中方只丢小钱, - JJZ (436 bytes) 2008-04-25, 09:04:18 (221264)
      • 中国也有一些真正的航空技术人员, 真正的军人. - JJZ (105 bytes) 2008-04-25, 09:59:30 (221272)
        • 当那些一直做技术研究的人员也能够丰衣足食了，这个国家的整体科技水平才是比较高的。 (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:07:00 (221276)
          • 废话！那么多政府公务员要吃喝拉撒睡，技术人员靠后站吧！ - xinku (110 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:12:37 (221277)
            • 什么地方技术人员不是靠后站? 只是能不能够丰衣足食的问题. (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:36:05 (221296)
              • 靠后站当然就不可能丰衣足食了 - xinku (28 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:41:35 (221300)
                • In US, 技术人员是不是靠后站? 能不能够丰衣足食? (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:52:48 (221310)
                  • In US, 技术人员不是靠后站, 能够丰衣足食 (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:58:10 (221313)
                    • In the US, policy makers are always in the front. Technical - steven (72 bytes) 2008-04-25, 12:00:05 (221334)
                    • 不靠后站, 能不能"二奶三奶老婆孩子七大姑八大姨表哥表嫂"? (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 11:04:38 (221320)
        • 如果他们真正优秀的话，那应该是西方学习他们而不是反之 - xinku (36 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:06:49 (221275)
          • 我说没"他们真正优秀", 我说他们是真正做工的人 (无内容) - JJZ (0 bytes) 2008-04-25, 10:17:24 (221283)

加跟贴