送交者: Enlighten 于 2008-05-12, 12:22:17:

• 其实俺也想问这个问题,三峡能引起地球自转轴偏离,挤压地球板块应该不是问题 (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:42:44 (225513)
  • BS, "三峡能引起地球自转轴偏离"? (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:44:32 (225516)
    • 非常小,物理并且可以算出.三峡水重量即使比地球板块小得多,也可能帮助漂移而引起地震 (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:09:58 (225537)
      • Who knows, maybe it's the water weight help reach the trigger point (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:15:53 (225543)
        • any reference? (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:17:42 (225547)
          • Not really, mostly my 2c. Maybe it's not worth a dime, just throw out there (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:22:06 (225552)
            • i believe the impact is below noise level - not measurable (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:25:15 (225555)
              • R U a physics or mechanics major? (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:33:46 (225561)
                • neither (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:39:26 (225566)
                  • I'd listen to myself rathar than you then (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:45:31 (225570)
              • I have no idea, maybe u r right, that's why I was asking the question (无内容) - 粪青 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 13:30:30 (225559)
• 估计没多大 (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:41:15 (225512)
  • 中国很难有客观评价---保坝派会说没有，反坝派会说很大 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:44:10 (225514)
    • 这种事哪里也不会有客观评价，你歇歇8 (无内容) - 老中一一号 (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:45:55 (225519)
      • 跟“哪里都有腐败”一样糊涂 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:51:47 (225521)
• 你就直接说是中南海引起的就行了 - 3322 (29 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:32:14 (225507)
  • 你联想丰富但科学态度缺乏 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2008-05-12, 12:36:25 (225509)

加跟贴