送交者: queue 于 2008-02-08, 01:03:59:

回答: ??, definitely not a computer geek :) 由 xj 于 2008-02-07, 23:10:34:

• 就像recursive function一样，层数越多就越慢。 - queue (38 bytes) 2008-02-08, 01:14:37 (204049)
  • 就论坛这排帖子而言，不需要recursive function - xj (212 bytes) 2008-02-08, 11:46:47 (204098)
    • 俺只是举recursive function做例子，并没有说要用recursive function - queue (301 bytes) 2008-02-08, 12:55:50 (204114)
      • 其实这东西没你想象得那么复杂。程序只在发帖的时候更新 - xj (251 bytes) 2008-02-08, 13:16:10 (204121)
        • 斯蒂文大哥都在提醒你，你还没当回事 - queue (309 bytes) 2008-02-08, 13:36:53 (204123)
      • 新警察吧。俺啥也不是。一文科生，理科业余爱好者。:) - xj (42 bytes) 2008-02-08, 13:09:40 (204119)
  • the only algorithm to mock recursive function is recursive function. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-08, 02:02:14 (204051)
    • if prior states are to be remembered. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-08, 02:07:14 (204053)
  • 1. recursive functions are not efficient 2. 1x2=2x1, if you know what I mean (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2008-02-08, 01:46:55 (204050)
    • What else can you do? if the problem is inherently recursive, Like qsort? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-08, 02:06:12 (204052)
      • 1. recursion should be avoided for trees. 2. "层数越多就越慢" is - 008 (355 bytes) 2008-02-08, 02:39:56 (204054)
        • I was trying to guide them to the difference between recursive - steven (269 bytes) 2008-02-08, 15:40:46 (204147)
        • by using a bookkeeping stack data structure - wasguru (111 bytes) 2008-02-08, 15:08:42 (204139)
        • how do you avoid recursion when you deal with tree? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-08, 10:10:19 (204081)

加跟贴