送交者: 短江学者 于 2008-01-09, 14:47:01:

回答: It is a 共识 that Turing machine = algorithm 由 xinku 于 2008-01-09, 14:41:01:

• MatLab 可以给出许多方程的解析解呢 (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 14:54:36 (196919)
  • 所以说"常"而非"都".clever tricks are beyond machine now. - 短江学者 (110 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:00:15 (196925)
    • but you cannot say machines cannot have their "mind" by essence - xinku (56 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:02:38 (196927)
      • I didn't say that. I think they will. I just try to say - 短江学者 (57 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:07:11 (196931)
        • 如果你相信所有自然现象都归结为量子现象，而量子效应是离散的，二进制怎么啦？ (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:15:34 (196936)
• so what? human being can solve all equations? (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 14:48:47 (196914)
  • 我是要说明algorithm定义不确. 如果认为获得解析解也算是algorithm的话. (无内容) - 短江学者 (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 14:55:24 (196921)
    • you don't know what you were talking about. - steven (459 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:15:17 (196935)
    • algirithm's definition is very clear: the process of a Turing machine - xinku (54 bytes) 2008-01-09, 14:57:45 (196924)
      • 也有算法根据方程算出解析解?要举例吗? - 短江学者 (51 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:05:20 (196929)
        • 简单：一元二次方程 - xinku (76 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:09:21 (196932)
          • 我意思我可以给很多例子机器无法得解析解的. (无内容) - 短江学者 (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:12:35 (196934)
            • You confused about this, and dead wrong. - steven (56 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:17:50 (196938)
            • 我可以给出很多例子，人也无法得出解析解 (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-09, 15:16:21 (196937)

加跟贴