送交者: sybil 于 2008-01-12, 12:39:03:

回答: 这个完全不一定 由 xinku 于 2008-01-12, 12:36:44:

• 历史上无数代都是富不及三代，偏偏到你这一代就变了世道？ (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-12, 12:41:26 (197538)
  • 社会现象，归纳思维不理性 (无内容) - sybil (0 bytes) 2008-01-12, 12:47:34 (197541)
  • 我们等着看盖茨的孩子有多大出息 (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2008-01-12, 12:42:17 (197540)
    • 盖次就是巨富的孩子。 - tom_cat (8 bytes) 2008-01-12, 13:46:56 (197548)
      • Gates family was rich, not superrich like Bill Gates III. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-01-12, 14:38:33 (197557)
        • not as rich as bill gate, but definitely superrich - tom_cat (716 bytes) 2008-01-12, 15:03:14 (197566)
          • it depends on your definition of superrich. There were many people - steven (86 bytes) 2008-01-12, 15:54:42 (197574)
            • so? Today, people with $2 million dollar asset are rich enough - steven (62 bytes) 2008-01-13, 00:34:32 (197634)
            • 1967, $3000 is close to 2 years tuition in Harvvard - tom_cat (107 bytes) 2008-01-12, 18:20:16 (197588)
          • McCaw就是另一个靠老爸余荫变成巨富的 - 老中一号 (311 bytes) 2008-01-12, 15:12:50 (197569)
            • Bill Clinton, he was from a very humble family. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-01-12, 15:55:55 (197575)

加跟贴