Why "公费旅游" is always bad?



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: skipper3 于 2005-2-23, 12:56:30:

回答: 中国红色旅游和变相公费旅游(ZT) 由 hah 于 2005-2-23, 11:53:58:

If its total benefit outweighs the total cost, it should be promoted. In this case it is just government subsidizing tourism industry in less developed region. As long as visitors are not forced to go there what's so wrong about it? "这是一种变相补贴贫穷农村的办法,把公家的钱移过去用。”isn't that what you whining people want all the time?

"好奇者可能是居多数的". yeah, people go to Washington and Philadelphia are also "好奇者可能是居多数的" but they most likely received "意识形态教育". US government also pay all the cost of building and housekeeping historical sites and museums they don't charge visitors a penny for using these facilities so 方觉 maybe should pay more attention to how his own government uses his tax dollars.





所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl