Zhu's allegations grabbed national attention after they were reported in a 3 February article in the Chinese newspaper 21st Century Business Herald. Zheda issued a statement the next day, laying the blame on He and stating that Li's name had been given as a coauthor of the fraudulent papers without Li's authorization.
Yang Wei says he is now personally sending out retraction requests.
祝国光的指控于2月3日被中文报纸《21世纪经济报道》报道，随后获得了全国关注。浙大次日发布声明，将过错归于贺海波，并声明，李连达的名字被作为造假论文的共同作者未经李连达授权。
最后一句漏了：
杨为说他正在亲自发出撤稿的请求。
A team led by Harold Garner of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas has analyzed several papers and added them to the Déjà vu database of extremely similar publications (spore.swmed.edu/dejavu/duplicate/74404/); also see entries 75181 through 75184. "We try to provide the most unbiased data possible which an appropriate body, such as an editorial board or a university ethics board, can use to make their own evaluations," says Garner.
【??此段似与全文无关??】
这一段很有关系：里面的网页给出5个例子，列举李连达实验室论文发表的异常。试着译一下：
由达勒斯德克萨斯大学西南医学中心的Harold Garner带头的一个小组对几篇论文做了分析并把它们加入到“似曾相识”这个极端相似文献的数据库（spore.swmed.edu/dejavu/duplicate/74404/;以及75181至75184这几个条目）。Garner说，“我们试着提供尽可能不偏颇的数据让合适的团体，比如一个编辑委员会或大学职业操守委员会，使用从而做出他们自己的评判。”