送交者: @ 于 2009-09-02, 12:29:23:

回答: 班主会不会写光的波／粒子本性之争？ 由 gyro 于 2009-09-02, 12:23:32:

• "从哲学上看", there is no change whatsoever - gyro (73 bytes) 2009-09-02, 12:32:04 (361471)
  • 请别玩三级跳，照顾一下非哲学人士。还是请先把“聚焦”问题 - @ (78 bytes) 2009-09-02, 12:38:04 (361472)
    • Not the same. - gyro (283 bytes) 2009-09-02, 12:44:37 (361475)
      • can't the scientific methods of the focusing process - @ (227 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:04:15 (361489)
        • That is happening all the time - gyro (104 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:12:39 (361491)
          • 果如此，可不可以这样看呢：科学发现的球越大，其和未知的 - @ (12 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:31:56 (361494)
            • The way I said it - gyro (168 bytes) 2009-09-02, 15:49:48 (361520)
            • 瞧你，一用这个熟知的比喻， 那么高深的话题被你庸俗了 - gyro (59 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:35:48 (361495)
              • As long as it works, never changes。 - @ (78 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:48:12 (361497)
                • 我从来不否定哲学的价值，至少可以看作是一种艺术。但像田野那样 - @ (187 bytes) 2009-09-02, 14:11:17 (361498)
      • thx. (无内容) - @ (0 bytes) 2009-09-02, 12:57:42 (361485)
        • thx. (无内容) - gyro (0 bytes) 2009-09-02, 13:01:17 (361488)

加跟贴