哪有什么INITIATOR。有时候就是吹牛，吹牛的人被挑战，如此而已。

哪有什么INITIATOR。有时候就是吹牛，吹牛的人被挑战，如此而已。

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: fuzzify 于 2009-11-05, 14:00:00:

回答: BLUFF的人首先是INITIATOR，CALL　BLUFF是CHALLENGE　BACK，相对BLUFF的是REACTINARY 由 meiyou 于 2009-11-05, 13:56:38:

if no bluff at the beginning, how do you call? (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 14:03:21 (381058)
- 没错，就是挑战这个bluff, 而不是应战这个bluff (无内容) - fuzzify (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 14:06:10 (381059)
  - sigh, i doubt eddie is going to use ur interpretation:) (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 14:46:11 (381086)
    - 你可真是一个死脑筋。具体情况具体分析嘛，他的书和我上面引用的例子有所不同。 (无内容) - fuzzify (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 14:49:08 (381089)
      - do u play poker? 'call' imlpies 'reactionary' - meiyou (181 bytes) 2009-11-05, 14:55:37 (381095)
        
        你吹过牛皮吗？:) "call" implies 主动挑战这个牛皮， - fuzzify (265 bytes) 2009-11-05, 15:11:13 (381099)
        
        yes, i played that game and i know it is different from poker - meiyou (155 bytes) 2009-11-05, 15:16:33 (381102)
        
        meiyou - you could say i was trying to split hair though (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 17:39:51 (381126)
        
        难道你没有吗？:) (无内容) - fuzzify (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 15:39:01 (381110)
        
        you just fuzzify everything:) (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2009-11-05, 15:26:19 (381108)
        
        I know where it came from. But it is later used in other places. - fuzzify (193 bytes) 2009-11-05, 15:23:43 (381107)