送交者: steven 于 2010-03-28, 19:35:49:

回答: 科学家没有实现把这一类可能性考虑进程序设计。 由 潜伏九号 于 2010-03-28, 19:27:13:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer) - 潜伏九号 (141 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:39:28 (426641)
  • I know how Deep Blue works. I was trying to tell you that you couldn't - steven (271 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:48:24 (426648)
    • 围棋和象棋不同，围棋看来难的多。 - steven (318 bytes) 2010-03-28, 20:16:09 (426658)
      • thank you. I rest my cae. (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 20:41:18 (426670)
    • 其实我也是这个意思。为什么围棋就至今没有deep blue beat human? (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:57:25 (426651)
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer) - 潜伏九号 (1178 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:46:11 (426646)
    • Chess Supercomputer Beaten Up By More Popular Computer - 潜伏九号 (4184 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:48:02 (426647)

加跟贴