因为他们的悖论：一方面宣扬末日论，另一方面又拒绝核电、水电、转基因

Green VS. Green, Part 1

Greens argue that the scientific evidence in support of climate change tell us we must take action yet they simultaneously ignore potential solutions -- like nuclear power and GE food -- despite scientific evidence that they are useful tools. In the first part of a two post series, Breakthrough Senior Fellow Siddartha Shome discusses this perplexing Green paradox.

他们不喜欢瑞典的模式——依靠核电和水电

Denmark Dispute Greens tout Denmark as a renewable mecca, but Sweden -- powered largely by hydro and nuclear -- has a far less carbon intense energy mix.

No GMO for Krakow In Europe, protests against GE crops or GMOs, like this one in Krakow, are largely based on ideological distrust, not scientific evidence.
http://thebreakthrough.org/blog/2010/05/green_vs_green_part_1.shtml