送交者: HHS 于 2010-06-15, 12:31:02:

回答: Bigger displacement number == bigger array of weapons (usually) 由 虎子 于 2010-06-15, 12:25:04:

• I think it's just a simple matter of cost-per-unit-volum - 虎子 (167 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:37:35 (453026)
  • 一架波音大飞机好象和一架战斗机价格差不多一个数量级的 (无内容) - HHS (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:40:51 (453027)
    • Notice that this is cost-per-unit-volume - 虎子 (161 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:43:52 (453029)
      • 因为不造大战斗机的alternative是造许多小战斗机，所以当然要比叫大飞机和小飞机 (无内容) - HHS (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:49:04 (453031)
        • But airplane was not in your original question (无内容) - 虎子 (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 13:44:20 (453040)
          • I take that back. What I mean is that in your question - 虎子 (86 bytes) 2010-06-15, 13:46:03 (453042)
      • And I think shouqilouzi was right - 虎子 (71 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:46:30 (453030)
• 机载激光武器，还不够牛叉？小战斗机能装的下吗？ (无内容) - whatistruth (0 bytes) 2010-06-15, 12:33:28 (453024)

加跟贴