As one can find, solid physicists do not rely on chemistry feeling.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 三脚猫 于 2010-02-05, 00:02:15:

回答: I didn't mean to question the correctness of your argument, was just curious 由 suprathinker 于 2010-02-04, 23:31:29:

Energy band theory is the first choice, which is necessary for Si, Ge, GaAs and so on. These elements have medium and close electronegativity; their energy bands are wide in condensed state; so there are many probability to form materials of different property. Chemical bond theory is not enough to describe it, but the basic chemistry rules will not be broken. You can imagine Ga and As can occupy each other's position in GaAs, but this is definitely forbidden in ZnO. Electrons of Zn2+ 3d and O2- 2p are not quite delocalized either.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明