批判饶毅-01: “批判" is for enemy, 批评 is for commrade?

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Fuzzlogic 于 2010-07-26, 18:21:05:

回答: Who is going to write "批判饶毅" 由 Fuzzlogic 于 2010-07-26, 18:16:14:

Obviously, 饶毅 sits in the opposite side of FZZ

所有跟贴:

〈〈Die Kritik des Gothaer Programms 〉〉中文经典翻译叫 - JFF (227 bytes) 2010-07-26, 20:00:57 (467663)
- 批判某人也能同解吗 - tidan (58 bytes) 2010-07-26, 20:26:51 (467674)
  - "十批不是好文章“，说的这么具体仔了，你就不能自己查哈文献？ - JFF (318 bytes) 2010-07-26, 20:48:18 (467682)
    - 没看过《十批判书》没发言权 - tidan (252 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:02:46 (467688)
      - 十批的批判是中性的学术批评。 - JFF (238 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:18:44 (467698)
        
        不必了多谢 (无内容) - tidan (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:20:30 (467701)
      - 对斯大林的批判可不是学术中性的。跟批判刘少奇林彪四人帮一样， - JFF (44 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:07:55 (467692)
        
        这就是我问你的 - tidan (86 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:14:52 (467695)
        
        Very good examples and points (无内容) - Fuzzlogic (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:13:32 (467694)
        
        how many:_) (无内容) - tidan (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:17:40 (467697)
        
        Three examles, karl marx's book, mao's poem, and guo's ten critiques. - Fuzzlogic (74 bytes) 2010-07-26, 21:26:57 (467703)
  - 可能跟“批斗”搞混了:_) (无内容) - tidan (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 20:28:49 (467677)
- Good poem (无内容) - Fuzzlogic (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 20:06:11 (467665)
什么逻辑，这显然是支持方舟子的文章！改为批评更有人说三道四了 (无内容) - coubert (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 18:23:33 (467647)
- Logic? tell me the difference between "批评中医' vs 批判中医 (无内容) - Fuzzlogic (0 bytes) 2010-07-26, 18:30:21 (467649)

加跟贴