但是,Beaumont试验并非严谨。评论者怀疑肖壶的“效果”是骶神经切断术或腹压排尿的效果,要求对照试验:“a control population going through the same rigorous surveillance regimen.”。
论文本身也是不严谨的。1号病人反射弧根本就没建立(表1:Reflex Present, 12 Mos: No),却装模作样地给出了尿流量压力图(图2)。评论者嘲弄的应该就是这一例病人:
One of the most curious findings is the discrepancy between urodynamic data and subjective voiding. One patient exhibited a decrease in capacity and an absence of reflex arc, and yet he subjectively reported improved bladder and bowel function!
评论者也不严谨:)
第一个评论引用了肖那篇不存在的会议报告。第二个评论把1号病人(本来是She)写成了He。