送交者: Latino2 于 2005-4-12, 16:52:32:

回答: To be fair, they don't have to be 客观公正 由 HunHunSheng 于 2005-4-12, 16:43:36:

It's XYS's mission to tell the public if their claim has scientific base or not.

• 拿绿党基金会的钱,凭什么要公开说明是"绿色和平"的mission? - fagus (147 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:13:02
  • 你汉语有限，边上凉快去。 - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:15:18
    • 话题围绕的是接受绿党基金经费,如果你偷换 话题是你的事情. - fagus (0 bytes) 2005-4-12, 18:03:21
• They can claim whatever they want. XYS can rebuff. But simply - Smashedmouth (69 bytes) 2005-4-12, 16:56:54
  • 对堕胎，宗教, 核能，环境等的主张可以说成某人的政治主张吧？ - Latino2 (47 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:02:28
    • That's what I meant. Before "we" are not sensitive, WE should - Smashedmouth (42 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:15:31
      • 方的原话是“是拿国外有政治背景的 组织的钱的.....” - Latino2 (63 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:26:47
        • 冤枉不冤枉和引起歧义是两码事儿么。按你这说法巴林顿博士也是博士么。俺是说 - Smashedmouth (38 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:37:56
          • I agree that Fang didn't need to use this strategy at present time. - Latino2 (70 bytes) 2005-4-12, 17:40:20

加跟贴