Apparently it is not what you think

送交者: Amargi 于 2011-02-16, 14:16:18:

回答: 你说的可能是这种情况：最初只写了净额，没包括免去学费的那部分，签证官认为由 chouqilozi 于 2011-02-16, 14:10:58:

No one is that dummy and even the original I-20
would not make that kind of mistake. The format from any aprticular university would have been long established by then.

所有跟贴:

怎么保证是已是成规了？有些小学校可能那个时候才第一次接收中国学生。签 - chouqilozi (96 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:24:05 (548562)
- 系里给钱，学校发I-20.两边稍微有点问题，I-20就可能有错误。 - bullrider (98 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:27:27 (548565)
  - The point is: vetrean applicants knew what is going on - Amargi (236 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:40:56 (548574)
    - No,you have bad memory. - bullrider (157 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:51:22 (548577)
      - 我说的就是比如原来I２０说＄８０００＋＄１４０００(tuition) 。 - Amargi (150 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:55:31 (548580)
        
        改I-20做假的不能说没有。（我没听说过）。 - bullrider (88 bytes) 2011-02-16, 15:01:52 (548583)
not really, TUITION wavier is often omitted in I-20. (无内容) - bullrider (0 bytes) 2011-02-16, 14:20:15 (548561)

加跟贴