这是伯恩斯坦对刘实所歪曲的方舟子的“观点”的回应

送交者: 羽矢于 2011-03-31, 13:00:47:

回答: 除非这是伪造的由美加净于 2011-03-31, 11:40:42:

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502041670100q6e5.html
> However, Dr. Fang has publicly defended his action and, as a matter of fact, he has repeatedly claimed that copying without reference is normal in writing popular science articles and books.

> Is it really true that there are different standards in defining plagiarism? Is copying without attribution really normal in publishing popular science works?

方舟子说的科普文章无需一一列出参考文献。

所有跟贴:

伯的回信是对＂科普文章和论文的标准是不一样的＂的一记耳光 (无内容) - 美加净 (0 bytes) 2011-03-31, 13:11:05 (570453)
- 伯说的是科普也不能互相抄；根本没反对科普引用学术论文的观点。虹桥来的，这么弱智？ (无内容) - lightman (0 bytes) 2011-03-31, 15:20:41 (570536)
- 回信是对刘实所歪曲的“观点”的一记耳光 (无内容) - 羽矢 (0 bytes) 2011-03-31, 13:17:00 (570457)
  - 你比虹桥的强不了多少，如果你是这么理解的。 (无内容) - 美加净 (0 bytes) 2011-03-31, 13:33:34 (570464)
    - 真有你这般SB的，方舟子的科普是英文？什么叫copy?? (无内容) - Bull (0 bytes) 2011-03-31, 14:05:24 (570479)

加跟贴