's progress more than fang did.

the only other1 with comparable contributions i can think of is yuan longping. but at least yuan has to share some credit with many colleagues, previous works, and government support; whereas fang had none or little (most of fang's supporters are jsut nobodies).

if TIME really wants seriously to find some chinese for its annual anouncement of msot influential people, how could they mention AWW, not fang. of course it's all politics.