送交者: boxer 于 2005-4-15, 13:05:25:
回答: 政策分析么，都是就事论事 由 xj 于 2005-4-15, 12:49:32:
"怒江流域的环境已经破坏了，当地居民本来就是一穷二白，还破坏环境，那么让他们走路是好事，不是坏事."
This is your argument. 我认为这是强盗的逻辑. 你在以貌似公正的形象在替别人思考.
从当地居民的利益出发, 建坝并不一定代表他们的利益. Even under very severe conditions, there could exist other alternatives.
Do you have the right to decide what is right or not for other people?
By the way, 做科学分析不是替别人思考. The opinion of local people should be counted. You do not have the right to decide what is good for them.
防止个人(或局部)观点的偏倚是通过合理的决策形式来实现的