constitution is not law, it is a principle to govern the government.

送交者: steven 于 2011-05-28, 12:39:36:

回答: 所以呀，“私有财产”这个概念还要细化，而不能泛泛的讲。由 ak70 于 2011-05-28, 12:33:15:

Constitution hence must be general enough, meaning that is has to be "泛泛的讲." The court is the only authority to interpret constitution. That is how a civilized country should be.

所有跟贴:

你也说是要“足够广泛”而不是“无限广泛”。否则不就乱了吗？ - ak70 (248 bytes) 2011-05-28, 12:52:08 (590398)
- 社会上有什么是无限广泛的？ (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-05-28, 13:33:58 (590399)
  - 我说“无限广泛”看来有表达歧义问题，还是叫“广泛到极点”吧。 - ak70 (416 bytes) 2011-05-28, 13:56:54 (590400)
    - look at Bernie Madoff, and see how difficult it is. - steven (125 bytes) 2011-05-28, 15:35:06 (590402)
      - many of his personal stuffs are auctioned out to pay - steven (168 bytes) 2011-05-28, 23:30:10 (590461)
      - Rent it out and collect the rent (无内容) - james_hussein_bond (0 bytes) 2011-05-28, 18:49:45 (590410)
      - 我自认为还是很务实的，以前在电视上砍李敖演讲说 - ak70 (300 bytes) 2011-05-28, 16:18:40 (590405)
      - if you were broke and could not afford real estate - cornbug (121 bytes) 2011-05-28, 16:03:46 (590404)

加跟贴