陈珂写那篇文章的时候,PNAS这篇文章还没出来。否则他肯定不会选这个题材了。


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 三脚猫 于 2011-07-16, 16:16:45:

回答: 科普作品如果写到让三脚猫觉得学到很多东西肯定有问题 由 008 于 2011-07-16, 14:09:18:

Olfaction is a chemical sense, not a spectral sense
PNAS 2011 ; published ahead of print July 7, 2011,

引用:
The depiction of the vibration theory as an alternative to
“shape” theory or a “lock-and-key” mechanism is misleading.
Odor chemistry involves many factors besides shape. Ethanol
and ethanethiol may have roughly similar shapes, but chemically
they are as different as roses and skunks. Using vibrations to
detect isotopes by odor is biochemically irrelevant because
animals have no need to make such distinctions. Olfaction is
a chemical sense, not a spectral sense. The relation between
odor similarity and chemical similarity is evident when one
considers not only shape but other concepts like molecular
weight, functional groups, polarity, acidity, basicity, and steric
interactions. Whether in humans or flies, odorants bind and
activate receptors through a combination of chemical features
no different from other types of receptor-based molecular signaling in biology (5).

Thomas P. Hettinger1

Department of Oral Health and Diagnostic Sciences, University of
Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030





所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明