◇◇新语丝(www.xys.org)(xys.dxiong.com)(xys.freedns.us)(xys-reader.org)◇◇ 徐荣祥的美宝湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)的临床试验结果 送交者: Yush 新加坡:MEBO与常规疗法具有类似效果,个别方面稍好,不是美宝所声称的治疗 所有烧伤的万能药。 香港:与另两种湿性疗法相比,未显示出美宝所声称的统计意义上的医学优势, 不适合深度烧伤治疗。 黎巴嫩:效果好。 美国:未能在http://clinicaltrials.gov查到美宝所声称的临床试验。 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_u ids=10748957&dopt=AbstractPlus Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000 Jan;29(1):7-10. The role of alternative therapy in the management of partial thickness burns of the face--experience with the use of moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) compared with silver sulphadiazine. Ang ES, Lee ST, Gan CS, See P, Chan YH, Ng LH, Machin D. Department of Plastic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. RESULTS: In patients with facial burns, MEBO was similar to silver sulphadiazine therapy with respect to rate of wound healing. Minimal slough was present over the wounds in MEBO-treated wounds resulting in clearer assessment of healing progression. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages of MEBO as compared to silver sulphadiazine in the management of partial thickness burns of the face include convenient change of dressing and easier assessment of healing progression. This suggests that MEBO is a useful alternative therapy for partial thickness burns of the face. ---------------- http://www.chinaburn.org/rac/pdf/08.pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_u ids=11549952&dopt=AbstractPlus MedGenMed. 2001 Mar 6;3(2):3. Evaluating the role of alternative therapy in burn wound management: randomized trial comparing moist exposed burn ointment with conventional methods in the management of patients with second-degree burns. Ang ES, Lee ST, Gan CS, See PG, Chan YH, Ng LH, Machin D. Singapore General Hospital, Department of Plastic Surger, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Erik_Ang@Hotmail.com OBJECTIVE: Our study was conducted to compare MEBO with conventional management (C) with respect to the rate of wound healing, antibacterial and analgesic effect, and hospital costs. ...CONCLUSIONS: MEBO is as effective as conventional management but is not the panacea for all burn wounds. The use of MEBO eases the management of face and neck burns and facilitates early institution of occupational therapy in hand burns. It confers better pain relief such that fewer opiates are used during the first 5 days after burn injury. DISCUSSION ...From the results of this prospective RCT, we concludethat MEBO is as effective as the conventional approach in the management of second-degree burns, though it is not the panacea for all burn wounds as claimed.... ---------------- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_u ids=14501397&dopt=AbstractPlus J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Sep-Oct;24(5):289-96. Pain control in a randomized, controlled, clinical trial comparing moist exposed burn ointment and conventional methods in patients with partial-thickness burns. Ang E, Lee ST, Gan CS, Chan YH, Cheung YB, Machin D. Singapore National Burn Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Singapore. ...There was little evidence to suggest a difference in pain levels by treatment group with the exception of the postdressing pain levels in the first week when those receiving MEBO had a mean level of 0.7 cm (95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 1.1) lower than those on conventional therapy. MEBO appeared to bring greater pain relief for the postdressing assessment during the first week after burns. This initial relief, together with comparable pain levels experienced on other occasions, indicates that MEBO could be an alternative to conventional burns management. ---------------- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_u ids=15879746&dopt=AbstractPlus J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005 May-Jun;26(3):247-51. Efficacy of moist exposed burn ointment on burns. Zhang HQ, Yip TP, Hui I, Lai V, Wong A. School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong. ...although MEBO had a better wound healing rate than the dry exposure treatment, it did not show the medical advantage statistically, as has been claimed, over the other two treatments (P > .05), either in terms of wound healing rate or bacterial control. We conclude that the MEBO is not suitable for deep burn wound treatment, particularly when infection is a concern. (XYS20070823) ◇◇新语丝(www.xys.org)(xys.dxiong.com)(xys.freedns.us)(xys-reader.org)◇◇