有屁用，一架阿帕奇就可报销一个坦克营。啥年月了，还在搞坦克人海战术

有屁用，一架阿帕奇就可报销一个坦克营。啥年月了，还在搞坦克人海战术

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 炎阳于 2006-09-06, 13:03:19:

回答: HunHun, coments about: 解放军演习场面震撼坦克集群排山倒海冲锋由 AI 于 2006-09-06, 12:56:51:

阿帕奇用打吗，在伊拉克，阿富汗自己‘掉’下来多少了？ - 戏秦高僧 (119 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:36:12 (101286)
- 见过阿帕奇吗？知道A-10的厉害吗？ - true (62 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:18:35 (101334)
- 军事白痴才会对掉两架飞机大惊小怪，要看出勤率对事故率之比 - 炎阳 (223 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:43:37 (101289)
  - 掉架飞机事小，死个美国兵事大。你丫刚到美国吧，连这都不懂，一边凉快去。 - 戏秦高僧 (74 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:25:51 (101337)
    - Listen to what they said to a widow of a diseased american soldier - PhonyDoctorPhD (313 bytes) 2006-09-06, 17:39:52 (101344)
    - 怎么不敢? (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:42:59 (101340)
- 你也不对有时候正规军远不如乌合之众难对付 - HunHunSheng (103 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:40:31 (101288)
  - 美军现在能在正规战场上打败解放军 - HunHunSheng (60 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:46:07 (101290)
    - 我也觉的PLA正规战远不如美军，但剿匪应远超美军。 (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:59:55 (101324)
    - PLA doesn't have the ability to support a international disaster relief - steven (58 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:53:09 (101292)
      - Assuming they were transpostred there - HunHunSheng (191 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:56:11 (101294)
        
        who is gonna provide the logistics? weapon, food, fuel - steven (175 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:06:06 (101298)
        
        That is. If USA stand by and China want to find a small African country to screw - HunHunSheng (71 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:16:47 (101306)
        
        It is politics not militray capabilities - HunHunSheng (281 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:14:41 (101304)
        
        Just look at the Tsunami relief, China wasn't even there. - steven (80 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:46:56 (101318)
        
        A poor job will become best jobs if there is no alternative (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:52:23 (101322)
        
        chances are, there are alternatives, many other alternatives. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:09:13 (101329)
        
        China is not needed for apparent reason - HunHunSheng (30 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:50:53 (101320)
那你不说一个单兵对空导弹就可以把阿帕奇敲下来？ - 蓝隼 (332 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:07:13 (101280)
- 1. 阿帕奇腹部装有极厚防护装甲，可对护单兵对空导弹 - 炎阳 (306 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:20:14 (101282)
  - 打不穿装甲直接命中肯定也给震下来了，就像导弹打坦克，打不 - macland (48 bytes) 2006-09-06, 21:37:07 (101396)
  - war isn't that simple, and stinger missile can surely shoot down - steven (11 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:56:01 (101293)
    - well, under ideal scenario, it may. - 炎阳 (192 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:01:54 (101296)
      - stinger is responsible for shooting 300+ Russian aircrafts - steven (685 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:34:01 (101314)
    - 掉一架阵亡两个在补充一架就可以了除了家属也没人会把它当成大事情 - HunHunSheng (79 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:01:29 (101295)
  - 哈，单兵导弹打飞机一次只能发一枚么？ - 蓝隼 (268 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:30:00 (101285)
Tanks are still useful although it is more and more limited. (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:19:12 (101267)
- 只要战争的胜负还是以步兵踏上对方的阵地来算的，坦克就不会过时 - 蓝隼 (74 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:16:48 (101281)
  - 没有强大的空中掩护，坦克集群就是阿帕奇的活靶子，一一报销 (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:23:02 (101284)
    - 979打越南的时候根本没有空中掩护损失比较大但是谈不上全报销 - HunHunSheng (38 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:38:20 (101287)
- in the real battle, US won't allow enemy to form large column of tanks - 炎阳 (581 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:29:48 (101271)
  - US is not and should not be the only enemy, though most FQ thought so (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:35:45 (101315)
  - forget about US. how about Japan or Taiwan? (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:35:54 (101273)
    - 由武警和二炮配合 - BTS (14 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:57 (101275)
    - no use either. Even without involving of US force, PLA still can't beat T and J - 炎阳 (821 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:48 (101274)
      - 打越南还是打得不错的把凉山给打平了战争的目的就是让敌人miserable - HunHunSheng (157 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:55:54 (101277)
        
        如果让敌国每增加一个寡妇自己需要增加10个寡妇 - HunHunSheng (35 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:02:08 (101278)
        
        新月旗失色十字旗翩翩摩尔兵妻女痛哭阿非利加 - Lord Byron - HunHunSheng (1149 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:04:22 (101279)