Are you able to count? What you said does not go along with

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 何人可于 2007-01-05, 18:54:12:

回答: 请问steven 由揍汉奸于 2007-01-05, 17:53:23:

what the article bragged: 在王天保6次开炮、击落击伤4架敌机的同时，他的战友们也接二连三地打掉和打伤了3架敌机。

What you wrote: 志愿军空军击落美军空军飞机3架，自己被击落8架(其中有三架图-2轰炸机)。

Then, who's right?

所有跟贴:

您再好好读一读？ - 揍汉奸 (274 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:09:37 (118828)
统计不精确，伤、亡不分，伤、落也不分 (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 18:59:41 (118825)
- 这个不过是个新闻报道 - 揍汉奸 (46 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:15:12 (118831)
  - Could you soly rely on <抗美援朝战争史> for the fact? Have you - 何人可 (104 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:21:47 (118835)
    - 呵呵，我至少还有本书作为讨论的依据 - 揍汉奸 (20 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:30:05 (118838)
      - Wrong information hurts much worse than no information at all! (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 19:33:16 (118841)
        
        呵呵，您以为您是谁？ - 揍汉奸 (61 bytes) 2007-01-05, 20:19:33 (118859)
        
        除了说明你在胡说后才找的资料还能说明什么？ - janz (94 bytes) 2007-01-06, 12:48:08 (118965)
        
        Please see my new post above. Thanks! (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-06, 05:22:14 (118930)
        
        你愿意相信什么，说什么都行，最少也要拿出一些有分量的证据再说话。 - janz (56 bytes) 2007-01-06, 05:17:04 (118929)
        
        Even a nobody should have the rights to express doubts on something fishy. (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-06, 02:14:31 (118922)
        
        任何一只军队的战史都有错误 - 揍汉奸 (220 bytes) 2007-01-06, 00:27:15 (118912)
        
        跟错了，是给何人可的。 - janz (116 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:28:31 (118904)
        
        真无聊，你要是觉得资料不对，去找出正确的反驳他啊？ - janz (120 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:25:25 (118903)
        
        对中国方面的史料, I don't always 抱定死不承认的态度. But, this time, - 何人可 (364 bytes) 2007-01-05, 23:19:43 (118902)
        
        土共方面的战史确实有很多错 - 揍汉奸 (310 bytes) 2007-01-05, 21:08:27 (118873)
        
        The track record of the mainland publications made me think so. (无内容) - 何人可 (0 bytes) 2007-01-05, 20:32:04 (118865)

加跟贴