There was no statistically significant change

There was no statistically significant change

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: BDXDL 于 2016-06-22, 16:57:12:

回答: 澳大利亚控枪以后的情况，值得参考由 meiyou 于 2016-06-22, 11:49:43:

There was no statistically significant change in firearm homicides after the gun ban.

mass shootings - that is the issue! (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2016-06-22, 17:31:27 (811602)
- depends on how to define "mass shootings" (无内容) - BDXDL (0 bytes) 2016-06-22, 17:41:47 (811605)
  - Exactly, when talking about WMD, I wonder why people did not raise the question (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2016-06-22, 18:09:28 (811607)
    - 大规模杀伤性武器不是靠杀人数来定的，是靠武器的作用性质。 - 蓝隼 (206 bytes) 2016-06-22, 23:00:27 (811627)
      - washington post 那篇文章，所有结论都有图表，数据支持，只有 - BDXDL (155 bytes) 2016-06-23, 00:05:51 (811629)
        
        如果要得出禁止连发枪可以减少大规模枪击，必须 - BDXDL (78 bytes) 2016-06-23, 00:13:26 (811630)
    - 讨论问题当然要先搞清定义，就是为了防你这种辩不过就改变议题的滑头。 (无内容) - doublepar (0 bytes) 2016-06-22, 21:26:21 (811617)
    - Also, when we say: gun, is it toy gun or bubble gun or water gun? - silxirt (201 bytes) 2016-06-22, 18:11:31 (811608)