qm: 守法枪民跟歹徒枪战的结果，基本上都是好人得胜坏人毙命

送交者: ASH 于 2016-01-25, 11:07:18:

回答: 双方都不冷静。宣传的一个手段就是把小概率事件包装成常态。由 doublepar 于 2016-01-25, 10:52:15:

In this case, I wonder who is 好人, and who is 坏人. Of course you can say the shop owners are 坏人 for charging $25 service fee, and he and his son died. Therefore the statement "基本上都是好人得胜坏人毙命" remains true.

所有跟贴:

他既然说了“基本上”，你找个个例不就是没事找事嘛？如果你找到统计数 - whatistruth (143 bytes) 2016-01-25, 11:55:47 (800016)
Exceptions prove the rule - qm (173 bytes) 2016-01-25, 11:37:28 (800014)
- Who knows whether this is an exception. Why does NRA not allow - ASH (65 bytes) 2016-01-25, 12:39:52 (800023)
  - Easy justification - qm (614 bytes) 2016-01-25, 16:37:54 (800033)
  - NRA only opposes using public money to fund CDC "gun study". - doublepar (2193 bytes) 2016-01-25, 13:18:21 (800024)
    - If not CDC, is there government funding allowed in any other agency? - ASH (70 bytes) 2016-01-25, 13:58:10 (800025)
      - 司法部下面的司法统计局和联邦调查局每年都有有关研究和统计数字 - doublepar (163 bytes) 2016-01-25, 15:29:49 (800027)
Therefore 前面都是错误的前提，对后面的结论是否正确没有影响。 (无内容) - doublepar (0 bytes) 2016-01-25, 11:24:42 (800013)

加跟贴