送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-9-12, 15:29:36:

回答: 你这昏昏模型漏掉了最主要的人气指数，不算合格。 由 peanut 于 2005-9-12, 15:17:30:

Then I encourage you to try 抬高物价 (with 95% confidence). I forgot the derivation on aution theory, but I remember "winner's curse". The guy who win the bid in a common value aution actually got a less valuable object (yet, bidding is still optimal for him). Alas, his lost is your gain. 奸商。

• 还有，你这里optimal，是global，还是local的。 - peanut (0 bytes) 2005-9-12, 15:44:30
  • No. Global as there is only one point in this case. - mangolasi (504 bytes) 2005-9-12, 16:15:58
  • 毛小姐讲的是： - bluesea (118 bytes) 2005-9-12, 15:51:02
• 这句话不懂： got a less valuable object (yet, bidding is still optimal for him) - peanut (4 bytes) 2005-9-12, 15:40:12
  • I can not derive it to you on the spot. - mangolasi (480 bytes) 2005-9-12, 16:10:21

加跟贴