送交者: skipper3 于 2005-12-02, 17:24:04:
回答: 我疏忽了，我道歉 由 雪泥 于 2005-12-02, 16:17:55:
You are disgracing youself and your fellow WenKe by apologizing to them!
Now I see the unnecessary debate is all because these Like don't know how to ask you the right question. IT IS THEIR FAULT to ask for a generalized explanation to the study you quoted. It's their mistake because they don't understand an explanation of such study must always be with specific context. They should ask what that context is first.
Considering these LiKe received zero WenKe training but still like to discuss WenKe issue like they are the only experts, it would be nice if you had introduced this study by telling them the following(and in that order):
1. Hypothesis, aka "What is the issue?". This kind of study always begins with a precisely worded hypothesis.
2. Nature of study(empirical or conceptual etc.).
3. Methodology.
4. Result.
5. Conclusion.
5.