Rule is rule. It has to be respected before it's changed.



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: 啊撒 于 2005-2-04, 18:47:27:

回答: You guys don't share anything in common so the 由 skipper3 于 2005-2-04, 18:25:13:

Even though it may bring something positive to both sides, It's not the way that regulations exist.

There are many other ways that USTC may hire PAN, but it's amoral for them to use PAN. PAN is a kind of victim in this case.

Rule is made to be broken by whom? If the rule makers break it,then why rule?

If Pan breaks it, then you may say that; however, if USTC breaks it,then justice has to be served!



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl