The term "自我完善" is ill-defined.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2010-03-28, 21:10:48:

回答: 他的问题是:编程序的人只在程序中设立简单的规则,程序能不能通过自我完善 由 AQuestion 于 2010-03-28, 18:49:02:

A simple example, web search engine, overtime, the search result is getting "better" meaning that the relevancy of search results improve. Does it counted as self-perfecting? Or adaptive routing, the network adjust itself when nodes are added, or dropped out. The routing information are not programmed in by the programmers directly, is that self-perfecting?

If you are argue that the rules are programmed in by the designers, hence, it is not learning. Well, consider human cognitive, "learning" is imprinted in our brain too, isn't that "programmed" also? Unless you believe in meta-physical, human cognitive process is just as "mechanical " as data processing in computer, i.e it is based on input/simulation, and feedback...

Deeper Blue has about 700k grandmaster games and 4k positions in its database for opening. What is the difference between a human "learning" these from books which are written by others, and computer has it inputed by people.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明